« AFA Goes After Santorum | Main | Morning Conversation At Daffodil Lane After Being Up Much of the Night »
December 28, 2005
The Stages of Religious Development
There are few things that are more annoying than being right and being told to change what you believe because the right answer doesn't fit into the narrowly defined hate ideology of the Neo-Christian right wing in this country. This holiday season not only my faith, but my patience was tested incessantly because I'm in a place spiritually that your average Neo-Christian hate monger can not, and will not, ever be able to understand. So I asked myself the question that most of us of faith ask ourselves when faced with those who are to shallow or mentally lacking in the ability to achieve the level of faith we have reached can...what do I do about this insanity? Now I know what you're thinking...Jamison faith is a binary state and if you believe that I can tell you who you voted for in the last election and that I'm more likely to find you at a Klan rally than a peace march. This entire situation reminded me of a conversation I had with Shawn, a guy I know that's in Seminary school on the subject. He pointed me to book by Chaplain Scotty McLennan called Finding Your Religion.
In that book Scotty details the 6 levels of religious achievement that a person goes through before reaching what I'm going to call "pure" faith. Now I'm a big fan of having things numbered and organized...it's the sociologist and engineer in me that wants to think in mathematical formulas that I can wrap my mind around and analyze. Below the fold I'm going to paste the 6 levels in and have a brief discussion about how they apply to my life.
Stage One (Magic)
1.) Is your world full of spirits and demons?
2.) Are fairy tales your favorite kind of literature?
3.) Do you think God makes everything happen, for good and bad?
Stage Two (Reality):
1.) Do you spend a lot of time trying to determine what’s real and what’s not?
2.) Are scriptures true in a concrete and literal sense, rather than being stories and maxims that may or may not be real?
3.) Do you feel you can influence God’s actions by being good?
Stage Three (Dependence):
1.) Do you have an important peer group or leader who is primarily responsible for shaping your faith?
2.) Is it important to you to understand and follow religious doctrine and moral rules?
3.) Is your main image of God that of a perfect parent?
Stage Four (Independence):
1.) Is your spiritual life unique and personal?
2.) Do you often find yourself wanting to demystify scripture?
3.) Do you think of God or Ultimate Reality primarily as an impersonal force or spirit (or as nonexistent)?
Stage Five (Interdependence):
1.) Do you find a spiritual community important to you at the same time that you maintain your own distinctive faith?
2.) Do you experience spiritual power in religious symbols and myths that you can also analyze objectively?
3.) Do you conceive of God or Ultimate Reality both as a person and as an impersonal force?
Stage Six (Unity):
1.) Do you sense yourself in community with religiously committed people of any and all traditions?
2.) Is your consciousness ego-free and beyond paradox and ambiguity?
3.) Do you often feel that God or divine spirit is in everything and that everything exists in God or divine Spirit?
First things first. For the Atheists out there, I don't know how the author deals with the notion of no faith at all. For the sake of consistency I would guess there is a Stage Zero in which you believe in none of these things. This is not part of my concern, so I leave such issues for you to address in your own free time.
Now in my perfect world everyone at church would be forced to always have clearly displayed a card with the number of their current level of faith on their person. Mostly because I've found people at level 3 to be so backwards mentally that they should be avoided and be segregated off by themselves because they are so moronic that they aren't worth the effort to try and help them make it to the next level. Obviously you can tell I don't have my preacher hat on for this discussion. I'm talking about for me personally right now. If you've read the blog for any length of time you should know that I'm at a comfortable level 4. My faith is my own. I require no nanny God to Shepard me through life with the threats of death and destruction to be a decent person. I have internalized why I follow the rules and I follow them with little or no contemplation of the fact. When faced with a situation that is outside of my previous consideration I default to tolerance and understanding, then look for some religious precedent to fall back on. Which leads me back to the differences between people of varying levels of faith. I know many level 5 people and a few level 6 people, and I have to say it's never crossed my mind to try and drag them down to my level of spirituality. I respect that they are able to achieve something I currently just lack the ability to do. Some day I hope that I will be able to connect to a larger spiritual community and will be able to work toward common goals, but at this point that kind of community doesn't exist for me.
Which finally brings me to my original question. Should I tolerate efforts to bring me down to lower level of faith? Spiritually I can not bring myself to hate people that are different from me for that reason alone. If their actions do me no harm as a person, then their journey is their own. To me doctrine is the crutch of the weak minded fools who can't grasp principals of faith and goodness. So what is to be done to remedy the situation? Those that are permanently stuck at a lower level of spiritual development who lash insanely out at all who dare to travel further up the ladder of faith do themselves and their religions more harm than good. Mostly I pity them for their inability to grasp what kind of fools they really are. Then I try and put back on my preacher hat and ask the question...can they be saved from themselves? I mean if you have people so trapped in their own delusions that they aren't even aware how clueless they really are, how do you reach them? The easiest solution for everyone else is to isolate them and keep them at arms length, but there really isn't much hope for them with that approach. Normally I would expect that their ministers to step in and provide them harsh, but kind guidance away from their chosen path, but they seem to congregate in large masses of those who have no desire to grow spirituality just like themselves. The entire Neo-Christian movement in this country is just a glut of human apathy and ignorance spiritually. The notion of faith itself has been put in danger by those who lack the desire for anyone to gain higher and more mature levels of faithfulness and yet there doesn't seem to be any concern nationally about this.
I had hoped that this exercise would yield some insight into what to do about the problem, yet it has left me exactly where I was originally. I can already hear the radical hate mongering Neo-Christian response about how they aren't delusional, that the stages of faith are nothing more than a "liberal" construct to lead people away from their rigid hate ideology, but I think if they were capable of being honest at any level, they would have to admit the stages are legitimate, the real problem is with their lack of actual faith. Beyond some sort of broad revival of real faith in this country I don't see an easy way to solve this problem. The Neo-Christian hate ideology is just seeded way too deeply in this country. If anyone has any other suggestions, I'm looking for a good answer.
Posted by ManDrake at December 28, 2005 10:07 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.daffodillane.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/4619
Comments
Just for the record, I don't deny that they are levels of faith, but I also don't think that you can really put people neatly into these faith-level slots, or that there is a hierarchy of "which faith is more pure than which other". Nor do I think that we should label people so we can decide who to ignore or segregate, whether it be by race, or creed, or orientation, or income, or political leaning, or faith level.
Looking at those questions, I would answer yes to 1 and 2 under stage three; 1 under stage four; all of the questions in stage 5; and 1 and the first half of 3 under stage six. And I have no clue what question 2 under stage six even means. So what category would that put me under? Am I worthy of conversing with you?
Posted by: cjmr at December 29, 2005 9:31 AM
"Is your consciousness ego-free and beyond paradox and ambiguity?"
A psychologist would have a field day with that one! I think what they're going for is a lack of the sense that "what I believe is true because *I* believe it is true", combined with a sense that all those nasty biblical contradictions that the atheists point are simply irrelevant. (No one can get to stage six and be a literalist)
I think you can place many agnostics in Stage 4; who says belief is necessary? but this list has a definite no-atheists-allowed sense to it. I have seen a similar list for atheists, though; the stages were similar.
Posted by: reno at December 29, 2005 9:45 AM
What makes you think you would be defined as a Neo-Christian? You don't fit the profile, your contemplative, creative, and tolerant. All of these things are in stark contrast to a Neo-Christian.
If you are all of the stage 5 questions, then your a stage 5 person. Which if I were to have guessed, that where I would have put you. So that would make more worthy to talk to in hopes of actually gathering some much needed information to move my own faith forward.
As for labeling people, that was my grumpy side of my personality. Not an actual reflection of how I act or feel about the situation. In a perfect world where my life was easy, that's how things would run, but the world isn't even a close approximation of that dream reality. I tolerate all levels because that's the way things are, doesn't mean I can't yearn for a simpler way of life.
Posted by: ManDrake at December 29, 2005 9:47 AM
BTW, did you know that atheists can't hold public office in this state? Fortunately, the US Constitution overrules the little state Bill of Rights.
Posted by: reno at December 29, 2005 9:49 AM
I had heard about that, the Constitution class I took they were all up at arms about that. They put out the radical argument that the reason that religion wasn't legislated in the Constitution because the founding fathers knew it had already been legislated at the state level so they didn't need to make it into a Neo-Christian theocracy since it was already.
Posted by: ManDrake at December 29, 2005 9:54 AM
Obviously I should have been using my [sarcasm] [/sarcasm] tags this morning.
Posted by: cjmr at December 29, 2005 10:09 AM
I so regularly deal with Neo-cons and Neo-Christians that I take everything literally because they will.
Posted by: ManDrake at December 29, 2005 3:06 PM
That was very interesting..I will have to read that book. I'm reading a really good book right now, too along those lines called, "losing moses on the freeway: the 10 commandments in America." I will have to post a blurb about it on my site when I'm done with it.
Posted by: Monica at December 29, 2005 9:48 PM
Do Monica. I would like to hear what you think of that book. It sounds interesting.
Posted by: Dianne at December 30, 2005 9:42 AM